United States

OPINION: Art Punk & The Dismissal Of Punk Orthodoxy

| IZui0uMTe2

Art punk was the moment punk stopped congratulating itself and started asking harder questions. Emerging in the late Seventies as a dismissal of punk orthodoxy and refusal to let that rebellion calcify into costume. It channelled punk’s energy through conceptual art, minimalism, electronics and a deep suspicion of rock mythology. Bands on both sides of the Atlantic treated punk less as a sound than as a method, stripping it down, warping it and, in some cases, dismantling it altogether. What followed was music that alienated as often as it thrilled, and in doing so quietly reshaped everything that came after.


Art punk was never a genre anyone involved bothered to name at the time. Like most labels that later harden into received wisdom, it was applied by critics trying to explain why certain Seventies punk records sounded wilfully strange, emotionally evasive and intellectually awkward compared to the pub-brawl version of punk that nostalgia prefers to freeze-frame. Punk, in the familiar story, was about demolition, a righteous zero hour where rock was burned down and rebuilt from instinct alone. Art punk accepted the need for destruction, then immediately started asking what else might be salvaged from the wreckage. Ideas, for one. Doubt, irony, formal experiment, the suspicion that rock music might actually benefit from thinking too hard about itself.

The distinction was not technical ability or even experimentation for its own sake, but intent. Art punk distrusted punk’s own emerging clichés almost as much as it despised the bloated theatrics of Seventies rock. It had no interest in authenticity as sweat or sincerity, seeing both as just another costume. Instead, it treated rock as a medium to be dismantled, reframed and occasionally mocked. Songs could be cut short, stretched into abstraction or reduced to repetition. Lyrics might read like fragments, slogans or private jokes at the listener’s expense. Performance itself became a problem to be solved, often by draining it of charisma altogether.

New York provided the first sustained proof that punk did not have to mean bluntness. Television looked like a rock band but behaved like a literary salon with amplifiers. Their long, spiralling guitar lines owed more to jazz, poetry and restraint than to punk’s scorched-earth economy. Marquee Moon remains a provocation precisely because it refuses easy allegiance. It is neither punk-as-slogan nor rock-as-spectacle, but something cool, elevated and faintly aloof, a record that suggested punk might be a framework rather than a rulebook.

Talking Heads took a different route, draining punk of romance and replacing it with tension. Early Talking Heads records sound like anxiety formalised, clipped rhythms and minimal figures supporting lyrics obsessed with alienation, systems and self-surveillance. Borrowing freely from Dada, conceptual art and pop anthropology, they treated the modern city as both subject and laboratory. Punk here was no longer about escape but about exposure, about making the listener sit with their own discomfort.

If Talking Heads intellectualised punk, Suicide obliterated its remaining assumptions. Drum machines, primitive synthesisers and confrontational repetition stripped rock to its barest, most threatening elements. Suicide were not interested in scenes, solidarity or even approval. Their music functioned like an endurance test, daring audiences to confront boredom, menace and emotional void. In retrospect, they feel less like a punk band than a warning about where punk might end up if it followed its own logic to the extreme.

That logic became even more unstable in the American Midwest. Pere Ubu sounded like industrial collapse rendered as art. Drawing on musique concrète, free jazz and an atmosphere of civic decay, they made punk that felt genuinely alien. The Modern Dance was not a refinement of punk but a mutation, proving that the form could absorb noise, abstraction and paranoia without becoming polite. It is no accident that later British post-punk musicians treated Pere Ubu less as peers than as evidence that almost anything was possible.

Conceptual control reached its most explicit form with Devo, who turned the band into a piece of performance art. Their theory of de-evolution, identical uniforms and mechanical rhythms drained rock of humanist pretence. Devo’s satire was not playful but forensic, exposing the stupidity and conformity beneath American optimism. Punk, for them, was simply the most efficient delivery system for bad news.

In Britain, art punk arrived not as an opening statement but as punk’s second thought. Once the safety pins were commodified and the outrage routinised, bands began interrogating what punk could still do. Wire understood earlier than most that punk’s real weapon was not speed or volume but reduction. Pink Flag treated songs as raw material, slogans rather than statements. What followed was even more radical: a steady erasure of punk itself in favour of electronics, abstraction and distance. Wire did not betray punk. They completed it, then moved on.

Magazine offered a more overtly literary escape route. Howard Devoto replaced punk’s blunt nihilism with modernist unease, his lyrics circling alienation, desire and power rather than simply rejecting everything in sight. The music incorporated keyboards and art-rock structures without lapsing into comfort. Magazine mattered because they insisted that punk intelligence did not have to disguise itself as rage.

If some of this still looked like rock music, Throbbing Gristle arrived to ensure that nobody in the U.K. at least felt safe confusing art punk with entertainment. Emerging directly from the performance art collective COUM Transmissions, Throbbing Gristle treated sound as material and provocation as principle. Tape loops, electronics, transgression and deliberate moral discomfort replaced songs altogether. Their work sits at the outer edge of art punk, but it is essential, because it demonstrates the endgame of punk taken seriously as an artistic idea rather than a style. Once you accept that anything can be questioned, you eventually question whether music needs to behave like music at all.

The influences that shaped these bands rarely pointed backwards. Minimalism suggested repetition without payoff. Krautrock offered propulsion without blues heritage. In praise of negative space Dub revealed space and absence as compositional tools. Conceptual art legitimised irony, framing and emotional detachment. Above all, art punk rejected sincerity as a moral virtue. Authenticity, as rock had defined it, was exposed as another sentimental fiction.

What makes art punk still matter is how badly it fits with the way punk is now remembered. Contemporary punk nostalgia prefers leather jackets, simple narratives and the comforting lie that rebellion can be endlessly replayed without consequence. Art punk tells a harsher truth. It says that punk only mattered when it refused to behave, when it alienated its audience, when it dismantled its own myths faster than the market could package them. Very little of that spirit survives in a culture that treats punk as heritage branding.

Art punk was not about saving punk. It was about proving that punk was disposable. That once its job was done, the only honest response was to push it somewhere uncomfortable and leave it there. The real scandal is not that punk ended, but that so much of what followed pretended it never asked these questions at all.

RETROSPECTIVE: R.E.M.’s Epiphany

| IZui0uMTe2

A pivotal moment in R.E.M.’s evolution, Lifes Rich Pageant captures the band stepping out of the shadows and into focus. This retrospective long read examines its place in the R.E.M. canon, the creative risks that reshaped their sound, and why this fierce, principled 1986 album marked the point where conviction, clarity, and power finally aligned to signpost the future.

R.E.M. Lifes Rich Pageant

R.E.M. had already built a cult by the time Lifes Rich Pageant arrived in the summer of 1986, but it was still a fragile thing. College radio fame, earnest fanzine devotion, and a reputation for wilful obscurity are not the same as permanence. The first three albums had sketched a band almost mythic in outline: Michael Stipe’s voice half-buried, lyrics treated like overheard conversations, guitars that chimed rather than cut. They were beloved, but they were also evasive. Lifes Rich Pageant is the moment R.E.M. stopped hiding behind atmosphere and decided to speak plainly, loudly, and with intent.

It is their loudest early record, and that matters. Bringing in Don Gehman, fresh from work with John Mellencamp, was a deliberate act of sabotage against their own mystique. Gehman insisted on clarity, punch, and definition. Peter Buck’s guitar was no longer a shimmering fog but a serrated instrument, pushed forward in the mix. Mike Mills’ bass became a melodic force rather than a polite underpinning. Bill Berry’s drumming, often understated on earlier records, snapped into muscular life. This was R.E.M. discovering the value of impact.

The opening run is still startling. Begin the Begin does not drift in, it kicks the door off its hinges. Stipe’s vocal, for once, is up front and intelligible, full of clipped urgency. These are not cryptic mumblings but rallying cries, political and personal tangled together. The world is wrong, systems are broken, and the band sound newly determined to say so. The shift is not just sonic but philosophical. Where Murmur and Reckoning felt inward and impressionistic, Lifes Rich Pageant looks outward, alert to pollution, imperialism, environmental collapse, and moral fatigue.

Fall on Me remains the record’s moral centre. It is a protest song that never once raises its voice, a masterclass in restraint. The lyric is direct without being didactic, the melody aching without self-pity. It is one of the first moments where Stipe’s political writing finds a universal register, rooted in the body and the family rather than slogans. In retrospect, it lays the groundwork for everything from Green to Automatic for the People.

Cuyahoga extends that environmental concern into something almost elegiac. Rivers catch fire, civilisations poison their own wells, and history repeats itself with grim reliability. Yet the song does not despair. There is still a sense of wonder, a belief that naming the damage is a form of resistance. This balance between anger and hope becomes a defining R.E.M. trait, separating them from the hectoring earnestness that doomed many politically minded bands of the era.

Crucially, Lifes Rich Pageant does not abandon joy. These Days barrels along with almost reckless energy, Mills and Berry driving the song like men possessed. I Believe offers a kind of bruised optimism, a declaration of faith that feels hard-won rather than naive. Even Superman, a cover, serves a purpose. Sung by Mills, it punctures any creeping solemnity and reminds the listener that R.E.M. still understood pop pleasure, still valued humour and lightness amid the seriousness.

Within the R.E.M. canon, this album is the hinge. Everything before it is prelude, everything after it is expansion. Without Lifes Rich Pageant, there is no confidence to make Green, no authority to slow things down on Automatic, no credibility when the band take stadiums by the throat in the late eighties and early nineties. It is the moment they realise they can be both principled and powerful, obscure and accessible, righteous and tuneful.

It is also the album where Michael Stipe steps fully into his role as a frontman. Not a rock god, never that, but a communicator. His lyrics sharpen, his vocals project, and his presence anchors the band’s ambitions. He sounds less like a man whispering secrets and more like someone willing to be overheard.

Nearly four decades on, Lifes Rich Pageant feels less like a transitional record and more like a manifesto. It is R.E.M. announcing what they stand for, sonically and ethically, and proving they can do so without sacrificing complexity or grace. Many bands have a moment where talent hardens into purpose. This is R.E.M.’s, and it still crackles with urgency, intelligence, and the thrilling sound of a group realising exactly how good they can be.

CURRENT AFFAIRS: USA Rogue State? Part 2

| IZui0uMTe2

Following the events of January 3rd a continuation piece from my article USA Rogue State? February 2025.

USA: Rogue State? (Part 2) – A New Precedent

The great conflicts of our time still loom. Ukraine grinds on, the Baltic states remain taut, and Taiwan sits under permanent pressure. Yet America’s sudden strike on Venezuela suggests something else is shifting first: the way power is exercised, and the ease with which it is now justified.

The world has not tipped into open war. Not yet.

Ukraine grinds on. The Baltic states remain tense but intact. The Taiwan Strait is still defined more by naval choreography than gunfire. The much-trailed great-power collisions remain, for now, on the horizon. But something else has moved, quieter perhaps, and more corrosive.

The overnight American strike on Venezuela, unilateral and justified after the fact, is not the opening act of global conflict. It is something subtler and potentially more dangerous: a precedent in search of a doctrine.

Washington insists this was exceptional. A sui generis response to criminality, corruption and national collapse. That argument would be more persuasive were it not the standard preamble to almost every intervention of the past three decades. Exceptionalism, after all, has form.

What unsettles is not simply that the United States acted, but how easily it did so, and how thin the legal and diplomatic scaffolding appeared to be. There was no UN mandate. No coalition patiently assembled. No serious attempt to clothe the operation in the rituals of multilateral consent. This was not Iraq redux. There was no effort to persuade the world. There was merely an announcement that it had been done.

For America’s adversaries, this is not hypocrisy newly discovered. Moscow and Beijing have long dismissed the so-called rules-based order as a euphemism for American latitude. But the Venezuelan operation offers them something more useful than rhetoric. Evidence.

Russia, already at war in Europe, will draw a bitter but clarifying lesson. Allies, however loyal, are expendable when they cease to be useful or defensible. Venezuela was a geopolitical bauble: oil-rich, symbolically defiant, but strategically indefensible from Moscow’s perspective. Its removal does not weaken Russia militarily, but it further narrows the map of places where Russian power can plausibly shelter its friends.

This matters not because Venezuela was ever decisive to Russia’s fortunes, but because it represented something Moscow increasingly lacks: the ability to project influence beyond its immediate neighbourhood. One by one, those outposts are disappearing. The loss tightens Russia’s isolation at precisely the moment it can least afford it.

China’s calculation is quieter, but potentially more consequential.

Beijing does not depend on Venezuelan oil to function. It has diversified too carefully for that. But Venezuela has been useful precisely because it lay outside American influence, a supplier insulated from Washington’s leverage, sanctions and electoral mood swings. Energy security is not merely about volume. It is about options.

A Venezuela governed from Washington, or by a government whose survival depends upon Washington, removes one of those options. Oil that once flowed eastward under long-term arrangements may now be repriced, redirected, or simply discouraged. No announcement is required. Markets, like diplomats, understand power when they see it.

None of this proves motive. It does not need to. Geopolitics rarely operates on confession. The point is consequence. The removal of Maduro does not merely tidy up a regional problem. It reshapes the strategic environment in which Russia and China already feel increasingly hemmed in.

For the Baltic states, the lesson is more ambiguous. On the one hand, the operation demonstrates that American power remains overwhelming and decisively usable. On the other, it underlines an uncomfortable truth: US force is increasingly discretionary. It is deployed where Washington wills, not where treaties alone demand. Deterrence depends not only on capability, but on predictability, and predictability is precisely what has been weakened.

China, watching from Beijing, will be less interested in Venezuela itself than in the method. Taiwan is not Caracas. The military, economic and reputational costs of a move across the Strait are of a different order altogether. But the Venezuelan strike sharpens two competing instincts within Chinese strategic thinking.

The first is urgency: act before American resolve hardens further. The second is caution: note how swiftly international opinion curdles when sovereignty is breached without consent.

Beijing’s preferred posture remains pressure without ignition. Encirclement without invasion. Venezuela does not alter that calculus overnight, but it adds a volatile data point to an already unstable equation.

What Ukraine, the Baltics and Taiwan share is that they are already priced into global risk. Markets, militaries and ministries have learned to live with them. Venezuela was different precisely because it was unexpected. It did not emerge from slow escalation or a frozen conflict thawing. It arrived fully formed, announced as fait accompli.

This is why the episode matters beyond Latin America. It suggests a United States increasingly comfortable with post-hoc justification, less concerned with international buy-in, and more willing to test how far its power can be exercised before resistance coheres. That is not rogue behaviour in the cartoon sense, but it is a form of strategic unilateralism that corrodes the very norms Washington claims to uphold.

Supporters will argue that the outcome justifies the method. That a malign regime has been removed. That oil markets will stabilise. That a long-suffering population may yet glimpse reform. All of this may prove true. But outcomes do not erase precedents. They entrench them.

The question, then, is not whether America is a rogue state. The term remains too blunt, too loaded, too performative. The better question is whether the United States is becoming a situational state, one that applies law, restraint and multilateralism when convenient, and dispenses with them when speed or advantage beckons.

History suggests this is not a sustainable posture. Empires can ignore rules only while they write them. The moment others begin to improvise in response, the system fractures.

The great conflicts remain on the horizon. But Venezuela reminds us that the road towards them may not be paved with grand confrontations or red-line speeches. It may instead be littered with smaller, sharper acts, each justified, each exceptional, each making the next one easier.

And that, more than any tank column or missile test, is what should give us pause.

Next. Will a rogue USA look North?

Venezuela will not be the template. It will be the permission. Once permission is granted, the question is no longer where America will act next, but how those closest in Canada and Greenland will recognise the moment when alignment begins to feel like absorption. In his peculiar way Trump has asked nicely, we are beginning to see that this USA will simply take what doesn’t capitulate easily.

RETROSPECTIVE: Dire Straits’ 1980 Audiophile Delight

| IZui0uMTe2

A retrospective review of Dire Straits’ 1980 album Making Movies. Knopfler’s technical brilliance meets romantic melancholy in an era that supposedly had no use for either. In my heavily late Seventies NME hack influenced style.


DIRE STRAITS: Making Movies (Vertigo) 1980

There was something deeply suspicious about a band this technically accomplished in 1980. While half of London was still thrashing about in bin liners and safety pins, Mark Knopfler’s lot turned up with an album so pristine, 38 minutes so meticulously crafted, that you half expected to find the corners mitred.

Making Movies arrived eighteen months after their self-titled debut made them improbable millionaires in America, and it was clear they’d been spending the intervening period in expensive studios rather than the back rooms of grotty pubs. Recorded at New York’s Power Station with Jimmy Iovine producing – the man who’d just finished polishing Springsteen’s The River – this was Dire Straits going for broke, or rather, going for more money than they’d already got.

The opening salvo, “Tunnel of Love,” sprawled across eight minutes like some Dylanesque fever dream filtered through a Tyneside accent. It was all fairgrounds and Spanish guitars, with Knopfler’s finger-picked lines circling each other like moths round a sodium lamp. The man played like he was being paid by the note, which he probably was.

“Romeo and Juliet” – which got played to death on Radio 1 – was the sort of thing that had sixth-formers scribbling lyrics in the back of their French textbooks for years. It was wretchedly romantic, all unrequited longing and cinema queues, with Knopfler doing his best to sound like he’d actually had his heart broken rather than just read about it in a Leonard Cohen novel.

But here was the rub: it worked. Despite themselves, despite the almost offensive levels of musicianship on display, despite the fact that punk never happened in their world, Dire Straits crafted something genuinely affecting. “Hand in Hand” swung like prime-era Dylan, while “Les Boys” – a tawdry tale of Parisian transvestites – had the sort of seediness that Bowie used to do before he discovered Switzerland and synthos.

The centrepiece, though, was “Skateaway,” a peculiar bit of New Wave-ish funk about a rollerskating girl cruising through urban decay. It had synthesizers, for God’s sake. Synthesizers! On a Dire Straits record! Pick Withers’ drumming was tighter than a gnat’s chuff, and the whole thing sounded like what might happen if Steely Dan decided to have a go at writing a hit single.

Mark Knopfler remained an enigma wrapped in a headband. His vocals sounded like he was perpetually on the verge of nodding off, yet there was a sly intelligence to his wordplay that elevated this above standard-issue soft rock tedium. He’d clearly listened to a lot of JJ Cale, a lot of Dylan, a lot of those American FM radio staples, and he wasn’t afraid to nick the best bits.

The production was, predictably, immaculate. Every hi-hat shimmer, every bass throb from John Illsley, every keyboard wash from Roy Bittan (on loan from the E Street Band, no less) sat exactly where it should. It was the sonic equivalent of a freshly Hoovered front room with the cushions all plumped up.

Which brought us back to that initial suspicion. In an era when the most exciting music was being made by people who could barely play their instruments, Dire Straits were almost confrontationally competent. They weren’t interested in year zero, in tearing it all down and starting again. They wanted to take you to the pictures, buy you chips on the way home, and maybe have a bit of a cuddle if you were lucky.

And you know what? Sometimes that was enough. Making Movies didn’t change your life or inspire you to form a band in your mate’s garage. But on a rainy Tuesday evening when you were skint and miserable and the world seemed determined to grind you down, it might just have made things seem temporarily bearable.

Which, in 1980, was worth something.

RETROSPECTIVE: Talking Heads – Remain In Light 1980

| IZui0uMTe2

Some records arrive like a whisper and fade, others crash in like an avalanche and leave you stumbling in their wake. Remain in Light is one of the latter, a slab of paranoia, rhythm, and obsession that still sounds as unmoored and visionary in 2025 as it did in 1980. Forty-five years on, the album hums with the intensity of four New Yorkers trying to rethink the world, their identities, and what a pop record could do. It is both human and alien, cerebral and primal, art-school gone feral. Listening now, you realise Talking Heads did not so much make an album as invent a language for disorientation.

Part One: The Sleeve

Pick up the sleeve and your first impression is confusion masquerading as design. Four faces, distorted and layered, hover in red, black, and white, a simulacrum of identity rendered through early MIT image-processing technology. The work of Tibor Kalman and M&Co, it feels both robotic and living. Your eyes register familiar features, only to be immediately unmoored. Tina Weymouth’s fascination with African masks, refracted through digital manipulation, turns the human face into a machine’s suggestion. It is uncanny, a whisper of the postmodern anxiety that would haunt the next four decades of visual culture.

Every detail matters. The typography is sharp and arresting, suggesting urgency without screaming. Fighter-bomber Avenger silhouettes and ghostly abstractions hover in the margins, hinting at violence, both literal and psychic. The design does not complement the music so much as anticipate it, a visual prelude to the interlocking chaos within. In 1980, it was a statement that identity was mutable, mediated, and constantly under negotiation. Today, that’s the norm.

Kalman’s brilliance was in making technological imperfection a part of the aesthetic. The faces are corrupted, glitched, degraded – human error filtered through a machine. This is not a record cover; it is a manifesto. By the time you slide the vinyl from its jacket, you are already prepared for disorientation. What follows is not just music, it is an ecosystem, a carefully constructed labyrinth designed to engage both body and mind.

Part Two: The Music & Legacy

Recording began at Compass Point Studios in Nassau, a sun-soaked bunker that would become a crucible for genius and frustration alike. The band was joined by Brian Eno, the unofficial fifth Head, whose influence was less about notes than architecture. He arrived with a philosophy: treat the studio as an instrument, treat chaos as composition, and do not flinch at failure. The sessions were famously intense. The band worked long, bewildering hours, layering loops, polyrhythms, and improvisations until something miraculous emerged from the mess.

The foundation was African-inspired polyrhythms, specifically the hypnotic grooves of Fela Kuti. This was not mere imitation; it was a translation of complex rhythmic systems into a New York art-rock vocabulary. Each instrument moves independently, a conversation of contradictions. Drums and percussion interlock but never collide, basslines snake around vocal hooks, and guitars oscillate between melody and texture. Adrian Belew’s guitar is both nervous and ecstatic, Jon Hassell’s trumpet drifts like a mirage, and Eno’s synthesizer textures shimmer in the spaces between. The record is dense yet breathable, controlled yet chaotic, deliberate yet accidental.

Byrne’s vocals are equally layered, a collage of obsessions and idiosyncrasies. He borrows from hip-hop cadences, ritualistic chant, and fragmented narrative, creating a delivery that is more incantation than song. The lyrics often circle existential dread with playful detachment. In “Born Under Punches”, Byrne’s voice is manic and fractured, a protagonist grappling with information overload and identity crisis. “Crosseyed and Painless” is a sermon on anxiety, paranoia, and social collapse, delivered with sharp wit and relentless rhythm.

The album’s architecture is deliberate. The first side, buoyed by kinetic energy, draws you into the labyrinth. “The Great Curve” is an ecstatic frenzy, the band locked in an ecstatic groove that simultaneously propels and destabilises. By the time “Once in a Lifetime” arrives, you are primed for reflection. The song balances existential inquiry with dance floor immediacy, Byrne pondering selfhood and entropy against a backdrop of hypnotic repetition. It is both absurd and devastatingly human.

Side two darkens the palette. “Houses in Motion” jitters with post-industrial dread, a cityscape of anxiety rendered in sound. “Seen and Not Seen” drifts toward abstraction, its protagonist dissolving into observation, a meditation on presence, absence, and perception. “Listening Wind” introduces political undercurrents, a commentary on global turbulence and American complacency filtered through dense polyrhythms and hypnotic motifs. The album closes with “The Overload”, a spectral transmission that hints at collapse and transcendence simultaneously.

The genius of Remain in Light lies in its simultaneity. It is both academic and visceral, cerebral and bodily. It occupies a transitional space where intellect and instinct cohabit uneasily but beautifully. The recording process itself becomes audible: the tape loops, studio experimentation, and improvisational layering are part of the listening experience. You hear the struggle, the trial and error, the moments of panic and revelation. This is music as architecture, as experiment, as living organism.

Culturally, the album is a negotiation of influence. The band’s engagement with African rhythms is complex, filtered through Western ears and art-school sensibility. It raises questions about appropriation, translation, and homage, but the resulting work is undeniably original. It is a fusion of ideas and sounds that challenges the listener to reconsider boundaries, genres, and expectations. The record is not just a reflection of its time, it is a critique of it, questioning identity, technology, and the very notion of pop music as a commodity.

The legacy of Remain in Light is vast. Upon release, it charted modestly, yet critics recognised its audacity. The album influenced generations of musicians, from the electronic experiments of the eighties to the worldbeat experiments of later decades. It bridged punk’s urgency with funk’s elasticity, art-school conceptualism with dancefloor immediacy. Touring the album proved difficult; the complexity and intensity of the arrangements tested the band to their limits. Yet the recordings themselves endure, a testament to ambition, collaboration, and the willingness to confront chaos head-on.

Listening today, the album resonates with a prescience that is uncanny. Byrne’s exploration of selfhood, Eno’s textural interventions, the band’s rhythmic sophistication all speak to an era increasingly dominated by technology and mediated experience. Forty-five years on, the music still feels urgent, still unsettles and energises in equal measure. It is a record that rewards repeated engagement, revealing new facets with each listen. The textures, the contradictions, the obsessive layering, all retain their power to unsettle and illuminate.

In retrospect, Remain in Light is not just an album. It is a blueprint for artistic ambition, a testament to the potential of collaboration and the thrill of experimentation. It embodies the tension between accessibility and difficulty, dance and reflection, humour and despair. Its enduring influence is evident not only in the artists who followed but in the ways it continues to challenge contemporary listeners. The record is a meditation on identity, perception, and creativity itself, an exploration that remains vital and uncontainable.

Four decades on, the album hums with life, refusing to settle into nostalgia or canonisation. It is human, machine, ritual, and meditation all at once. The visual and sonic languages it employs remain radical; the ideas embedded in its grooves still resonate. Talking Heads, at their apex, were not content with simple pop. They sought transformation, and in Remain in Light they achieved it. 

Listening now, the record still demands attention. It insists on engagement, on immersion. The faces on the sleeve, the fractured rhythms, the cascading vocals – all converge to create an experience that is simultaneously exhilarating and disorienting. It is, as ever, a record that challenges, delights, and confounds.

Remain in Light remains a masterpiece because it continues to operate on multiple planes. It is art, it is music, it is philosophy, and it is ritual. It occupies a space that few albums dare to enter, and fewer still manage to navigate successfully. Forty-five years later, it retains its power, its strangeness, and its brilliance. Talking Heads created not just an album but a living organism, one that still breathes, pulses, and disrupts.

For those willing to engage fully, it remains an astonishing journey, a record that refuses to be tamed, a testament to what happens when intelligence, curiosity, and obsession collide. Remain in Light is not simply listened to. It is experienced, interrogated, and felt. It is, in every sense, timeless.

RETROSPECTIVE: Pixies Cactus. Deranged Desert Confessions

| IZui0uMTe2

This visceral dissection of the Pixies’ “Cactus” explores how Black Francis and Kim Deal transformed enforced separation into hypnotic art, with Steve Albini’s unforgiving production capturing every grain of dust and moment of claustrophobic desperation. From Deal’s lurking bass line to Francis’s cement-floor confessions, discover how this standout track from Surfer Rosa became a masterclass in making the deeply disturbing sound utterly conversational.


Black Francis has always been a twisted romantic, but “Cactus” – a standout track from the Pixies’ 1988 debut Surfer Rosa – finds him at his most beautifully deranged, crafting what amounts to a love letter from purgatory, set to the band’s most hypnotically sparse arrangement.

The musical architecture is deliberately claustrophobic, built around Kim Deal’s bass line that doesn’t so much groove as lurk. It’s a serpentine thing, all dusty menace and barely suppressed tension, creating the perfect sonic equivalent of that aged cement floor Francis keeps banging on about. You can practically hear the fine grey dust settling between the notes, taste the grit in every pause.

Structurally, this isn’t a song so much as a confessional booth with a backbeat. The Pixies strip everything down to its barest components – Francis’s parched distant vocals, Deal’s ghostly harmonies, and just enough instrumentation to keep the whole thing from collapsing under the weight of its own obsession. David Lovering’s drums are at the front and jarring, whilst the guitar work remains deliberately understated, all jangling chords that shimmer like Joshua Tree mirages.

But it’s the vocal interplay that transforms this from mere musical voyeurism into something genuinely unsettling. This is Francis and Deal as the ultimate dysfunctional duet – he’s the imprisoned narrator pleading from his concrete cell, she’s the distant object of desire, her voice floating in and out like radio static from the outside world. When Deal echoes his confessions, it’s unclear whether she’s offering comfort or mockery, complicity or judgment.

The lyrical content reads like evidence from a particularly disturbing court case. Francis isn’t just separated from his beloved; he’s been systematically isolated, reduced to fantasising about botanical transformation whilst begging for her “dirty dress” – not clean clothes, mind you, but something stained with her reality. It’s the ultimate fetishisation of absence, the sort of request that makes perfect sense when you’re slowly suffocating on dust and desperation.

That cactus metaphor becomes brilliantly twisted in this context – he wants to be the beautiful bloom emerging from the most forsaken conditions, the shocking pink flower against the grey industrial decay. She’s his unreachable desert rose, flowering freely whilst he’s trapped in his crumbling concrete purgatory, breathing dust and pleading for fabric scraps like some sort of textile vampire.

The genius lies in how the Pixies make this enforced separation sound almost… romantic? The way Deal’s bass undulates beneath Francis’s confessions creates a hypnotic, narcotic effect that draws you into his madness. You find yourself nodding along to what are essentially the ramblings of someone who’s been driven half-insane by isolation and desire.

Enter Steve Albini, the sonic sadist who’s never met a comfortable sound he couldn’t make deeply unsettling. His production on “Cactus” is a masterclass in controlled brutality – every element recorded with the sort of unforgiving clarity that makes you feel like you’re trapped in that concrete room alongside Francis. Albini’s genius lies in his refusal to pretty things up; instead, he captures every uncomfortable detail with surgical precision. The way he’s miked Deal’s bass makes it sound like it’s emanating from the walls themselves, all room tone and industrial hum. Francis’s vocals are recorded so intimately you can hear the dust catching in his throat, the slight rasp that suggests he’s been breathing that concrete powder for hours.

This isn’t the polished sheen of major label production – it’s the sound of someone slowly going mad in real time, captured with documentary-like fidelity. Albini understands that the Pixies’ power comes from their contradictions, so he emphasises the contrast between the song’s spare arrangement and its emotional intensity. The echo isn’t artificial reverb but actual room sound – those institutional walls bouncing Francis’s confessions back at him like an acoustic prison. Every space between notes feels pregnant with unspoken desperation, every silence loaded with the weight of enforced separation. What makes this collaboration so essential is how Albini’s aesthetic – that unflinching commitment to sonic honesty – perfectly complements the Pixies’ emotional brutality. He’s not interested in making things comfortable for the listener; like Francis trapped on his cement floor, Albini wants you to feel every grain of dust, every moment of claustrophobic desperation.

What elevates “Cactus” above mere shock tactics is its restraint. Francis doesn’t scream his perversions like some metal headcase – he croons them like lounge standards, making the deeply disturbing sound utterly conversational. It’s three minutes of audio therapy for anyone who’s ever been trapped by circumstances beyond their control, reduced to making impossible requests of impossible people.

Kim Deal’s contribution cannot be overstated – she’s not just providing backing vocals but acting as the song’s conscience, its connection to the outside world. When she harmonises with Francis’s cement-floor confessions, it’s as if she’s bearing witness to his psychological unravelling, making her complicit in whatever’s happening in that fevered brain of his.

“Cactus” is ultimately a Pixies’ masterclass in making the deeply weird sound utterly normal, the sort of song that reveals new layers of unsettling detail with each listen. It’s pop music for people whose idea of romance involves enforced separation and uncomfortable furniture. The result is a recording that sounds simultaneously intimate and alienating, like eavesdropping on someone’s breakdown through concrete walls.

Brilliant, really. And more than a bit disturbing.

RETROSPECTIVE: The Beautiful Madness Of Pet Sounds

| IZui0uMTe2

From surf music to sonic revolution: why Pet Sounds remains pop’s most extraordinary achievement and Brian Wilson’s last coherent masterpiece.


At the passing of the musically creative genius Brian Wilson, I’ve written this sixth decade reappraisal of The Beach Boys album Pet Sounds as a meditation on one of music’s most extraordinary creative achievements. A work that represents both the culmination of years of obsessive craft development and the sound of consciousness chemically expanded beyond conventional limits.

From a technical, production and arrangement perspective Pet Sounds – compared to literally everything produced beforehand anywhere is like comparing a Chevy Bel Air with a Saturn 5 rocket plus Apollo orbiter and lander. But this quantum leap didn’t emerge from nowhere. Wilson had been methodically building towards this moment since 1962, spending obsessive hours in Gold Star Studios, studying Phil Spector’s wall of sound techniques firsthand. By the time of “I Get Around,” he’d already developed an uncanny ability to hear individual instruments within dense arrangements and was experimenting with unconventional microphone placement that suggested an intuitive understanding of acoustic space.

Between 1963-1965, Wilson systematically expanded his musical vocabulary in ways that would prove crucial to Pet Sounds’ revolutionary impact. His harmonic progression from basic surf progressions to the complex jazz-influenced arrangements of “California Girls” and “Help Me Rhonda” shows us his systematic musical development. Wilson was absorbing Bach, studying Four Freshmen arrangements, and incorporating diminished chords and unexpected modulations. Simultaneously, he was cataloguing an increasingly exotic instrumental palette – harpsichord on “When I Grow Up,” orchestral arrangements on “The Warmth of the Sun,” and unusual percussion combinations that would later bloom into Pet Sounds’ bicycle bells, dog whistles, and Coca-Cola bottles.

Perhaps most significantly, Wilson’s vocal arrangements grew increasingly complex through albums like “Today!” and “Summer Days.” He was developing techniques for recording his own voice multiple times to create impossible harmonies, essentially turning himself into a one-man choir. This technical mastery meant that when his consciousness expanded, he had the tools to translate internal complexity into actual sound.

The emotional development running parallel to this technical growth was equally crucial. Wilson’s evolution from teenage surf fantasies to the adult anxieties about love, isolation, and belonging that permeate Pet Sounds wasn’t simply chemical revelation – it was the natural progression of a sensitive artist confronting the complexities of the human condition.

Substitute liquid hydrogen mixed with oxygen and a lit match with LSD and a musical genius and you’ll get Wouldn’t It Be Nice and God Only Knows here, and later Good Vibrations – his unique sounding music incredibly recorded on limiting four track equipment. It famously shook Paul McCartney to up his game and Bob Dylan has since remarked “Brian recorded Pet Sounds with four tracks, nobody else could record it with one hundred”.

Listen to Pet Sounds now, knowing what we know about Wilson’s lysergic acid adventures, and those otherworldly arrangements make perfect sense. Of course “God Only Knows” sounds like it was transmitted from heaven to Wilson’s rewired consciousness while operating on a papal frequency the rest of us can’t even tune into. But the genius wasn’t that Wilson was taking drugs – the entire suburb of Laurel Canyon was tripping in ‘66. The genius was that he was disciplined enough, focused enough, and talented enough to document his pharmaceutical journey with obsessive precision, using a toolkit of techniques he’d spent four years perfecting.

“I Just Wasn’t Made for These Times” we thought it was teenage alienation set to music. That maybe a prophetic autobiography from someone who’d already glimpsed his own future. The Theremin isn’t just an exotic instrument; it’s the faraway sound of Wilson’s cognition misfiring – in real time, beautiful but disturbing. But Wilson had been experimenting with unconventional instrumentation for years – this wasn’t random psychedelic inspiration but the culmination of systematic sound exploration.

The production techniques he described as derivative of Phil Spector and revolutionary in ‘66 now reveal themselves as the work of someone literally on another level. Wilson wasn’t just multi-tracking vocals he was seemingly attempting to capture the sound of multiple personalities having a conversation inside his head. Yet this vocal architecture built upon years of development – turning himself into a one-man choir through techniques he’d been perfecting since the early Beach Boys recordings.

Those impossibly complex arrangements on tracks like “Wouldn’t It Be Nice” aren’t showing off; they’re the musical equivalent of someone trying to make real something only he could hear in his imagination in ways difficult or impossible for lesser mortals to comprehend. But they’re also the work of someone who’d spent years absorbing Bach, studying the ‘Four Freshmen’ arrangements, and incorporating jazz harmonies that as mentioned most pop musicians couldn’t even hear, let alone execute.

What’s terrifying and brilliant is how Wilson managed to harness his disintegrating mental state and turn it into art. The drugs that were slowly destroying his grip on reality were simultaneously opening doorways to musical territories that simply don’t exist for the chemically unenhanced, a musical Doors Of Perception and where, see Aldous Huxley, heaven eventually becomes hell. Every overdub, every bizarre instrumental choice, every impossible vocal arrangement was Wilson obsessively following his rewired neural pathways to their logical conclusion – but using a musical vocabulary he’d been building methodically for years.

“Pet Sounds” the instrumental also makes more sense when viewed through this lens – it’s the sound of Wilson’s mind trying to process information through a consciousness that’s been chemically recalibrated. Those conversations between saxophone and percussion aren’t random; they’re Wilson translating internal dialogues that were becoming increasingly complex as his brain chemistry shifted, but executed with the instrumental sophistication he’d been developing since his earliest studio experiments.

Most people who’ve ingested that much LSD, in greater quantities than Syd Barrett, a similarly progressive British musical casualty and founding member of Pink Floyd, can barely tie their shoelaces, let alone orchestrate 40-piece arrangements that still sound futuristic. Wilson could do this because he’d already built the technical foundation – the chemicals didn’t create his abilities, they liberated them from conventional constraints.

But here’s the truly heartbreaking bit – we can now hear Pet Sounds as Wilson’s last completely coherent statement before the drugs and the pressure and the sheer weight of his own vision crushed him. Every perfect detail, every impossibly beautiful moment, every note that shouldn’t work but does – it’s all evidence of a mind operating at peak capacity whilst simultaneously consuming itself.

The comparative commercial failure in the America of 1966 was simply because the market wasn’t ready for avant-garde popular music made by someone now playing piano 24/7 seated in a sandbox. They wanted surf music from those nice clean-cut boys; what they got was the sound of now unkempt, long haired and bearded genius having a nervous breakdown in slow motion set to beautiful melodies. Remember that alongside the pressure generated creatively there’s financial pressure from Capitol who are ploughing dollars into the project. Yet another stress that’s under appreciated and rarely mentioned. Yes the total cost of a project might be oft quoted but not the absorption often by one sensitive creative person.

Wilson’s story since Pet Sounds – the breakdown, the bedroom years, the pills, the decline – only makes this album more precious. It’s the sound of someone touching something spiritual whilst burning up in the atmosphere of their own obsession. He gave us a glimpse of what’s possible when infinite talent meets unlimited chemical enhancement, and then paid the price for that glimpse with his sanity. Like many in era he flew close to the sun paid for it.

Pet Sounds isn’t just one of the greatest pop albums ever made – it’s a document of human consciousness pushed to its absolute limits and somehow managing to create beauty instead of chaos. Wilson took drugs that would have turned most people insane and used them to access musical dimensions that don’t exist for the rest of us. But he could only do this because he’d spent years building the technical and emotional vocabulary necessary to translate the untranslatable.

Now years later, Pet Sounds stands as both monument and warning – proof that sometimes genius requires madness, but also that madness without the foundation of obsessive craft development produces only chaos. Wilson’s achievement was combining systematic musical development with chemical consciousness expansion, creating something that transcended both.

Essential, heartbreaking, still beyond the comprehension of the majority. In era? Conpletely out there.

RETROSPECTIVE: The B-52’s – S/T (1979) It’s Joy As Rebellion

| IZui0uMTe2

Picture this, it’s ’79 – punk’s getting philosophical and Seventies disco is wheezing waiting for it’s Eighties inhaler. Then five exuberant nutters from Athens, Georgia rock up to dance this mess around a bit.

The B-52's Self Titled Debut Album From 1979 Retro Reviewed


I realised while thinking about the ‘next one’ that being a punk, new wave, indie and nowadays classic rock fan there’s not exactly much joy in my album racks. A few disco era, the Bee Gees’ Saturday Night Fever soundtrack is mostly upbeat even if the film is grittier than you’d expect.

So running my finger along the spines and out slides this bright yellow pop art cut and paste thing by Sue Ab Surd (get it?) that sounds exactly like it looks. Joyful but odd in equal measure and totally new wave – because what other genre would have them? Art Brut now included music.

Nearly half a century on, and the B-52’s debut still sounds like it was made by visitors from Planet Claire where everything’s inclusive and brilliant all the time. What we’ve learned in the intervening decades is that this wasn’t just a great teenage party record – it was the moment American rock music remembered it was allowed to smile.

Back in ‘79, punk was getting all serious and art-school, chart disco was dying on its arse, and new wave was formed sixth formers in skinny ties looking miserable. Then along came five lunatics from Athens (Georgia) – with beehive hairdos, ‘a ‘thrift store’ look before Molly Ringwald and the audacity to suggest that rock music could be simultaneously completely mental and absolutely brilliant.

The genius of it is clearer now than ever. While their contemporaries were desperately trying to be cool, the B-52’s had stumbled onto something much more powerful – they were trying to be joyful. And joy, as it turns out, is infectious.

Fred Schneider’s vocal approach was nothing short of revolutionary, though nobody realised it at the time. That Schrechgesang ‘speak-sing’ delivery that seemed bonkers in ‘79 basically invented alternative rock vocals. Indie frontman like Michael Stipe channelled a bit of Fred’s fearless weirdness. The man gave permission for rock singers to stop being frontmen and be themselves.

“Rock Lobster” once destined for the bizarre list alongside Telephone Man and Oh Superman! has revealed itself to be pure genius – a seven-minute masterclass in how to build tension, create atmosphere, “Rock lobster, down, down” and anyone that way inclined lose their mind on a dance floor. please listen to it now. It’s f***ing crazed. As the closer for side one it’s perfect, you cannot wait to hear side two. Chapeau Chris Blackwell and B-52’s.

Fun fact; Cindy Wilson’s screaming vocals, reminiscent of Yoko Ono (with the mic left on) and the album’s playful nature directly inspired John Lennon to come out of retirement to write and record Double Fantasy. That tells you everything about its power. If it was good enough to get a Beatle excited about music again, it’s worth attention. It’s hot lava!

But here’s what’s become most apparent with time, this wasn’t just novelty nonsense. The B-52’s were proper musicians creating genuinely innovative sounds. Kate Pierson and Cindy Wilson’s vocal interplay was decades ahead of its time, creating templates that alt-rock new wave bands like the Go-Go’s would follow. Ricky Wilson’s guitar, jangly alien-surf-rock, created a sound that would dominate US college rock for the next two decades.

The Athens connection looks even more significant now. That vibrant and bustling college town also produced R.E.M. and literally dozens of lesser known US indie bands. But the B-52’s got there first, proving that stateside you didn’t need to be in New York or LA to create something world-changing. All you needed was great imagination, a sense of humour, and no shame.

What’s remarkable is how modern this record still sounds. You could play “Planet Claire” today and it sounds fresh, unaffected by fashion and super upbeat. It exists outside of time, belonging to no particular era because this album created its own entire universe.

The album’s influence on fashion, art, and general cultural weirdness is immeasurable. The B-52’s made it acceptable to be fun and outrageous. Note fun. They proved that style and substance weren’t exclusive, that you could be completely over the top and still create lasting art. This is Drag Race T-40 years, no B-52’s no Scissor Sisters, maybe for a few coming out became easier and every person who’s ever teased their hair into an impossible shape owes them a drink.

Looking back, the production by Chris Blackwell is inspired. A clean, spacious mix that lets every mad element breathe – it was the perfect sonic setting for controlled chaos. While punk records were deliberately aggressive and new wave was often formulaic and sometimes saved by power pop, the B-52’s found the sweet spot where everything was clear, punchy, and completely alive. Over the next decade other US alternative bands like R.E.M applied the jangly guitar courtesy of Peter Buck and clean uncluttered mixes, Sonic Youth particularly on Daydream Nation that clarity and chaos evident here and The Go-Gos who applied similar vocal interplay, there are also similarities with Talking Heads although these are simultaneous with Brian Eno at the controls until 1981.

A then revolutionary feminist angle has only become more apparent with age. In an era when women in rock were still fighting for basic recognition, Kate and Cindy weren’t just singers – they were equal creative partners, their voices driving the songs as much as any instrument. They presented a model where gender was irrelevant; all that mattered was bringing their energy.

What’s most impressive about revisiting this album now is how it’s aged like fine wine whilst somehow getting more relevant. In our current era of manufactured authenticity and focus-grouped strategy, there’s something deeply inspiring about the B-52’s’ complete commitment to their own beautiful madness. They had a vision, admittedly involving lobsters, aliens, and enough Harmony [insert any US hair spray for local readers] to punch a hole in the ozone and they pursued it with utter conviction.

The ripple effects are still being felt. Is too much to say that without the band and this album, there’s no US college rock explosion or indie revolution, no acceptance that American rock could be colourful and strange. Kurt Cobain in those big white sunglasses. The B-52’s didn’t just make a great debut – they rewrote the rules.

Forty-six years on, “The B-52’s” debut album remains the sound of pure possibility, proof again from these retrospective reviews and research (also for my book Art Pop / Pop Art) that the best art comes from the margins, from people who care more about creating something wonderful than following the rules. It’s a record that gets better with age, revealing new layers of genius with each listen. I’ve loved playing it again.

In a world that often feels like it’s forgotten how to have fun, the B-52’s debut stands as a reminder that sometimes the most revolutionary thing you can do is refuse to take yourself too seriously. They created music that was so purely themselves that it transcended trends, genres, and decades.

Still essential. Still mental. Still absolutely bloody brilliant. 6060-842!

RETROSPECTIVE: Lennon’s Lost Weekend

| IZui0uMTe2
John Lennon's Lost Weekend. At home in Beverly Hills.


Eighteen Months of Madness in the Heart of Hollywood. The ex-Beatle’s wildest period yet – sex, booze, and Rock’n’Roll excess that nearly destroyed a legend.

Right, so you think you know John Lennon? The peaceful Beatle, the ‘Bed-In’ revolutionary, the bloke who gave us “Imagine”? Well, think again, because between October 1973 and early 1975, our John went completely barmy in Los Angeles – and we do mean completely. They’re calling it his “Lost Weekend,” though at eighteen months, it’s more like a lost year and a half.

It all started when Yoko threw him out of their Dakota apartment. Yes, you heard right – she actually booted him out, told him to go find himself or some such psychological bollocks. “Go away and have your midlife crisis somewhere else,” was apparently the gist of it. So off trots Lennon to La-La Land with May Pang, Yoko’s 23-year-old assistant, who’d been hand-picked by Mrs Lennon herself to keep an eye on her wayward husband.

What followed was a period of such spectacular debauchery that even Keith Moon would’ve raised an eyebrow. Lennon, aged 33 and supposedly a reformed character, promptly went completely off the rails in the most American way possible.

First stop was a beach house in Santa Monica that quickly became legendary for all the wrong reasons. Lennon surrounded himself with a motley crew of musicians, hangers-on, and fellow piss heads who turned the place into something resembling a Rock’n’Roll commune crossed with a rehabilitation centre – except nobody was trying to get clean.

The core gang included Harry Nilsson (already well on his way to drinking himself to death), Ringo Starr (taking a break from his own marriage difficulties), Keith Moon (just because), and a rotating cast of session musicians, groupies, and general wastrels. They called themselves “The Hollywood Vampires” – which tells you everything you need to know about their priorities.

Days would start around noon with cocaine and brandy, move on to more serious drinking by mid-afternoon, and end with everyone unconscious in various compromising positions around dawn. Lennon, who’d supposedly given up the hard stuff years earlier, was necking everything he could get his hands on – whisky, vodka, tequila, you name it. The man who once sang about peace and love was now starting fights in nightclubs and getting thrown out of venues across Los Angeles.

The nadir came in March 1974 at the Troubadour club, where Lennon and Nilsson had gone to catch an Ann Peebles show. Both absolutely legless, they proceeded to heckle the poor woman throughout her set. When staff tried to quiet them down, Lennon apparently shouted something unrepeatable about the management’s parentage and stormed off to the toilets.

But here’s where it gets properly weird – instead of using the gents, our revolutionary hero decided to relieve himself in a cupboard, emerging with a sanitary towel stuck to his forehead like some demented tribal marking. The press had a field day, of course. “BEATLE JOHN’S TOILET SCANDAL” screamed the headlines, and suddenly the man who’d once been the most respected musician in the world was reduced to a laughing stock.

The incident became symbolic of everything wrong with Lennon’s LA period. Here was a bloke who’d written some of the most important songs of the decade, reduced to pissing in cupboards and wearing feminine hygiene products as headgear. It was pathetic, really.

Amazingly, amidst all this chaos, Lennon was still trying to make music. The problem was, he was too pissed most of the time to do it properly. Recording sessions for what would become “Walls and Bridges” were exercises in frustration, with Lennon turning up hours late, completely bladdered, and unable to remember lyrics he’d written the day before.

Producer Jack Douglas later described the sessions as “like trying to record with a very talented ghost who kept disappearing.” Lennon would start a take, wander off mid-song, and return hours later having forgotten what they were working on. It’s a miracle the album turned out as well as it did.

The saving grace was May Pang, who somehow managed to keep some semblance of order in the chaos. Twenty years younger than Lennon and completely out of her depth, she nevertheless became his anchor during this period. She’d drag him out of bars, clean him up for recording sessions, and generally prevent him from killing himself through sheer stupidity.

If you want to know how mental things got, consider this: Lennon thought it would be a brilliant idea to record an album of Rock’n’Roll covers with Phil Spector producing. Yes, that Phil Spector – the gun-toting maniac who was already showing signs of the complete breakdown that would later land him in prison for murder.

The sessions, held at various LA studios throughout 1974, were legendary for their dysfunction. Spector would turn up armed (literally), paranoid, and completely controlling. Lennon, meanwhile, was usually drunk and belligerent. The two would spend hours arguing about arrangements while session musicians sat around collecting overtime pay.

One session ended with Spector firing a gun in the studio and then disappearing with the master tapes, leaving Lennon with nothing to show for weeks of work. It was like something out of a Martin Scorsese film, except it was real life and nobody was laughing.

The thing is, beneath all the chaos and self-destruction, you could sense Lennon was actually quite miserable. This wasn’t the joyful excess of a rock star living it up – this was the desperate flailing of a man who’d lost his way completely.

Friends from the period describe him as paranoid, lonely, and increasingly aware that he was making a complete tit of himself. The press coverage was universally awful, his music was suffering, and worst of all, he was alienating himself from the son he claimed to love more than anything.

Julian was still back in England with Cynthia, and Lennon’s contact with the boy was sporadic at best. When he did ring, he was often too drunk to hold a proper conversation. It’s heartbreaking, really – here was a man who’d sung about love and peace, completely unable to maintain relationships with the people who mattered most to him.

The long and winding road back… By late 1974, even Lennon’s legendary constitution was showing signs of wear. He’d put on weight, looked terrible in photos, and was developing a reputation as one of Hollywood’s most unreliable talents. Studio executives were starting to avoid him, club owners were banning him, and his behaviour was becoming genuinely concerning to those around him.

The wake-up call came when he collapsed during a recording session, apparently from exhaustion and alcohol poisoning. Rushed to hospital, he spent several days recovering while doctors told him in no uncertain terms that his lifestyle was unsustainable.

It was then that May Pang apparently sat him down for a serious conversation about his future. According to those close to the situation, she basically told him he could continue on his current path and probably die, or he could sort himself out and try to salvage something from the wreckage of his life.

The irony is that throughout this entire period, Lennon was in regular contact with Yoko back in New York. She’d ring him every few days, ostensibly to check on his wellbeing but apparently also to monitor his behaviour. Some cynics suggest the whole “Lost Weekend” was orchestrated by Yoko from the beginning – a way of letting Lennon get all his middle-aged rebellion out of his system while keeping him on a very long leash.

Whether that’s true or not, by early 1975 it was clear that Lennon was ready to return to New York and his wife. The LA experiment had run its course, leaving behind a trail of damaged relationships, wasted opportunities, and some genuinely questionable musical decisions.

But here’s the thing – as much as the Lost Weekend period was a disaster in human terms, it also produced some of Lennon’s most honest and vulnerable music. “Walls and Bridges” contains some genuinely affecting songs about loneliness and regret, while the eventually completed “Rock’n’Roll” album, despite its troubled genesis, showed Lennon reconnecting with his musical roots in ways that would influence his later work.

So what do we make of John Lennon’s Lost Weekend? Was it a necessary period of self-exploration, or just eighteen months of expensive self-indulgence? The truth, as usual, probably lies somewhere in between.

On one hand, it’s hard to have much sympathy for a millionaire rock star whose idea of finding himself involves drinking himself senseless in beach houses while his assistant-turned-girlfriend cleans up after him. The whole thing reeks of middle-class privilege and self-pity taken to absurd extremes.

On the other hand, there’s something genuinely tragic about watching one of the most important artists of his generation lose himself so completely. Lennon’s music had always been about honesty and emotional truth, and in some perverse way, his LA breakdown was probably the most honest thing he’d done in years.

The period also demonstrated something important about the nature of creativity and self-destruction in rock music. While the myth of the tortured artist is largely bollocks, there’s no denying that some of our greatest musicians have produced their most powerful work while falling apart personally. Lennon’s Lost Weekend wasn’t pleasant to witness, but it was undeniably real in a way that his more controlled periods sometimes weren’t.

Perhaps most importantly, it showed that even John Lennon – the man who’d helped change popular music forever – was still fundamentally human, still capable of making spectacular mistakes and learning from them. The fact that he eventually sorted himself out, returned to New York, and spent his final years as a devoted father and husband suggests that the Lost Weekend, for all its chaos, might have been a necessary part of his journey.

Whether it was worth eighteen months of madness is another question entirely. But then again, that’s Rock’n’Roll for you – never simple, never clean, and never quite what you expect from the outside.

Whatever gets you thru the night eh?

*The author wishes to acknowledge that this piece is based on publicly available information and interviews from the period, and that some details remain disputed by those involved.

#nowplaying John Lennon – Walls and Bridges (1974)

CURRENT AFFAIRS: America’s Reserve Currency Status Anxiety

| IZui0uMTe2

How Trump’s Trade Wars Threaten the US Dollar’s Global Crown

Since the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1945, the American dollar has reigned supreme in global finance. Like a trusted old friend, it has been welcomed across trading floors from Tokyo to London, from Sydney to São Paulo. Yet this remarkable privilege, often taken for granted in Washington’s corridors of power, now faces an existential challenge that few Americans properly comprehend.

When foreign manufacturers ship their trainers, televisions and trinkets to American shores, they collect dollar payments that subsequently flow through the veins of the global economy. These greenbacks grease the wheels of international commerce, particularly in vital commodities markets where oil, wheat and metals trade exclusively in Uncle Sam’s currency. The arrangement has served America handsomely, with foreigners regularly returning these dollars to purchase US Treasury bonds, effectively financing American government spending at bargain-basement interest rates.

This seemingly magical arrangement comes with a seldom-discussed requirement: America must run persistent trade deficits. Far from being an economic weakness, as populist politicians frequently claim, these deficits actually supply the world with the dollars it needs to conduct international trade. It’s a peculiar financial alchemy that transforms America’s appetite for imports into global financial influence.

The dollar’s supremacy isn’t merely about national pride, it’s the foundation of America’s financial advantage. When foreigners willingly hold dollars and dollar-denominated assets, they’re essentially providing interest-free loans to the American economy.

Yet this delicate system faces mounting pressure. The recent American embrace of punitive tariffs against major trading partners resembles nothing so much as a game of financial Russian roulette. As global commerce redirects away from American markets, the circulation of dollars naturally diminishes. Foreign exporters, holding fewer greenbacks, subsequently purchase fewer Treasury bonds.

The consequences quickly cascade. To attract sufficient buyers for its debt, the US Treasury must offer more generous returns, pushing interest rates upward across the American economy. Mortgages grow more expensive, corporate borrowing costs soar, and consumers face steeper credit card bills. Meanwhile, the American government’s interest payments balloon, exacerbating already troublesome budget deficits.

What many fail to grasp is that the dollar’s global status isn’t guaranteed by divine right, it depends entirely on the confidence of individuals and institutions worldwide, confidence that appears increasingly fragile.

Historical precedent offers little comfort. Reserve currency status, once lost, proves devilishly difficult to reclaim. The British pound’s agonising descent from global prominence after World War II provides a cautionary tale that American policymakers would be wise to heed.

Perhaps most concerning, America’s financial system operates with remarkably slim margins of safety. A Swiss watch requires a screwdriver not a hammer. The federal government’s debt has swollen to unprecedented levels, while interest payments consume an ever-larger portion of tax revenues. In this precarious context, preserving the dollar’s international standing isn’t merely a matter of prestige, it’s essential for America’s financial survival.

As spring sunshine bathes Washington’s cherry blossoms, America’s financial future hangs in the balance. Nobody but Trump and his team know if this is just a lull in the storm, or the strong arm tactics of Asia-Pacific countries and Canada selling US Treasury Bonds has given them the shock they require to back off this tough and misguided tariff policy? Do they fully appreciate the gravity of what’s at stake. For a nation accustomed to dollar dominance, the adjustment to a multipolar currency world or a pretender to the currency crown would prove jarring indeed.

See also, USA Rogue State and The Great Crypto For Gold Heist.

#GlobalFinance #DollarDominance #TradePolicy #ThinkTank #EconomicOutlook #InternationalTrade #FinancialMarkets